[ Home | Getting Started | Build Test Packages | Examples | User Guide | Release Notes | Document Map ]
< Previous Section: utAssert Package | Next Section: utOutput Package >
This package contains the following procedures and functions:
The utGen contains a procedure that allows you to generate a starting point for a unit test package. This package can be sent to the screen, a file, a delimited string or an array (best for interfacing with a front end). You can generate a stand-alone test package or code "fragments" to be placed inside an existing source package.
We strongly recommend that you use utGen.testpkg as a starting point for all of your utPLSQL unit test construction. By taking this approach, you will most easily (and transparently) conform to the most up to date guidelines for utPLSQL test packages.
Note: While utGen.testpkg goes as far as possible to generate sensible unit test code, you will need to edit this code before you can compile and use it.
Here is the header of the testpkg procedure:
PROCEDURE utGen.testpkg ( package_in IN VARCHAR2, program_in IN VARCHAR2 := '%', samepackage_in IN BOOLEAN := FALSE, prefix_in IN VARCHAR2 := NULL, schema_in IN VARCHAR2 := NULL, output_type_in IN PLS_INTEGER := c_screen, dir_in IN VARCHAR2 := NULL, delim_in IN VARCHAR2 := c_delim );
And here is a description of the parameters:
Parameter Name | Usage |
package_in | The name of the package or stand-alone program for which a test package is to be generated. |
program_in | The filter to be applied to the list of programs for which unit test procedures will be generated. So if you only wanted to generate unit tests for programs that start with "UPD", you would pass 'UPD%' for this argument. |
samepackage_in | TRUE if you plan to insert the generated code into the source package, FALSE if you want a stand-alone test package. |
prefix_in | The prefix to be used for the test package and/or unit test procedures. See section " Organizing Your Test Code" for details. |
schema_in | The schema that owns the package or program specified by package_in. The default is the currently connected schema. |
output_type_in |
The type of output that will receive the generated
code. Valid options are defined as packaged constants:
|
dir_in | The location of the file containing the generated code. Used only if you specify utGen.c_file for the output type. |
delim_in | The delimiter used to separate lines of generated code. Used only if you specify utGen.c_string for the output type. |
Before you use utGen.testpkg, you should make a few decisions about your generated code:
Here are some examples of using utGen.testpkg:
SQL> exec utGen.testpkg ('str')
SQL> exec utGen.testpkg ('str', samepackage_in => TRUE)
SQL> exec utGen.testpkg ('str', '%STR%', samepackage_in => TRUE)
Now let's explore how to direct the generated code to different types of output.
The default behavior of utGen.testpkg is to generate code to your screen (via DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE). So unless you specify some other value for output_type_in, the code will be displayed on your screen or within a window of your PL/SQL IDE (such as TOAD or SQL*Programmer and so on). You can then transfer that content to a file, or move it to another window for immediate editing and compilation.
Here is an example of using utGen.testpkg, while also spooling to a file:
SQL> set serveroutput on size 1000000 SQL> spool str.pkg SQL> exec utgen.testpkg ('str')
...out comes the code...
SQL> spool off
If DBMS_OUTPUT is not enabled in your session, then utGen.testpkg will not generate any output.
If you are working with utGen in a command line style (ie, you are not using a utGen-enabled GUI), then you will probably find it most useful to generate testing code directly to file. You do this by specifying utGen.c_file for the output type. You must also specify the directory in which you want the files (one for the package specification and another for the body)created.
Here's a generation request that creates two files named ut_str.pks and ut_str.pkb in the /newcode directory:
SQL> exec utgen.testpkg ('str', output_type_in => utGen.c_file, dir_in => '/newcode')
Notes on generating to file:
SQL> exec utconfig.setdir ('/newcode') SQL> exec utgen.testpkg ('str', output_type_in => utGen.c_file);
If you are accessing utPLSQL functionality through a GUI, you might find it more useful to direct output to a string (or array, see next section). You probably don't want to hassle with UTL_FILE (server-based file IO) and grabbing information from DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE is just a general hassle.
If you generate to a string, you can then retrieve that string value into a local variable and then parse it for display and manipulation. Here is an example of redirection to string:
BEGIN utgen.testpkg ('str', output_type_in => utGen.c_string); END;
The generated code is composed of multiple lines of information, so they need to be separated by a delimiter. The default delimiter is the vertical bar, '|'. You can override that and provide your own delimiter. In the following example, I have decided to use the carriage return character as my delimiter:
BEGIN utgen.testpkg ( 'str', output_type_in => utGen.c_string, delim_in => CHR(10)); END;
Great, so the code has been put in a string. How do you get all that generated code? Call the utGen.pkgstring function:
FUNCTION utGen.pkgString RETURN VARCHAR2;
If you are accessing utPLSQL functionality through a GUI, you might find it more useful to direct output to an array. You probably don't want to hassle with UTL_FILE (server-based file IO) and grabbing information from DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE is just a general hassle.
If you generate to an array, you can then retrieve the individual lines of code in the array through an API provided by utGen (the array itself is "hidden"). Here is an example of redirection to the utGen array:
BEGIN utgen.testpkg ('str', output_type_in => utGen.c_array); END;
Great, so the code has been put in an array. How do you get all that generated code? Take advantage of the utGen API to retrieve individual rows in the array, which offers these features:
Get the number of rows currently in the array:
FUNCTION utGen.countRows RETURN PLS_INTEGER;
Get the absolute index of the first row in the array:
FUNCTION utGen.firstRow RETURN PLS_INTEGER;
Get the absolute index of the last row in the array:
FUNCTION utGen.lastRow RETURN PLS_INTEGER;
The API offers a set of programs to iterate through the array, by maintaining a "current row" inside the package. You can:
Find out if you are positioned at the first row in the set:
FUNCTION utGen.atFirstRow RETURN BOOLEAN;
Find out if you are positioned at the last row in the set:
FUNCTION utGen.atLastRow RETURN BOOLEAN;
Find the first relative row containing the start of the package body definition. This is handy when you want to put the code for the specification and body in separate windows and/or files:
FUNCTION utGen.firstBodyRow RETURN PLS_INTEGER;
Retrieve the text in the Nth row of the array. This gives you "random access" to the contents of the array. You can even specify a negative direction to get the Nth row from the end of the array.
FUNCTION utGen.nthRow (nth IN PLS_INTEGER, direction utGen.IN SIGNTYPE := 1) RETURN codeline_t;
Set the pointer in the array to the specified row number. This allows you then move either forward or backward from that row in the array (using nextRow and prevRow, respectively):
PROCEDURE utGen.setRow (nth IN PLS_INTEGER);
Retrieve the line of code stored in the current row in the array (set via setRow, nextRow or prevRow):
FUNCTION utGen.getRow RETURN codeline_t;
Go to the next row in the array:
PROCEDURE utGen.nextRow;
Go to the previous row in the array:
PROCEDURE utGen.prevRow;
Show the contents of the array using DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE:
PROCEDURE utGen.showRows ( startRow IN PLS_INTEGER := NULL, endRow IN PLS_INTEGER := NULL);
Here is the code I would write in PL/SQL using this API to display the contents of the array (actually, it is the implementation of showRows):
PROCEDURE showrows ( startrow IN PLS_INTEGER := NULL, endrow IN PLS_INTEGER := NULL ) IS v_start PLS_INTEGER := NVL (startrow, 1); v_end PLS_INTEGER := NVL (endrow, utGen.countRows); BEGIN FOR indx IN 1 .. utGen.countRows LOOP DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line (utGen.getRow (indx)); END LOOP; END;
Here is the code I would write to separate out the contents of the specification from the body:
PROCEDURE showrows ( startrow IN PLS_INTEGER := NULL, endrow IN PLS_INTEGER := NULL ) IS v_start PLS_INTEGER := NVL (startrow, 1); v_end PLS_INTEGER := NVL (endrow, utGen.countRows); BEGIN FOR indx IN 1 .. utGen.countRows LOOP IF indx = utGen.firstBodyRow THEN -- switch to Body window or file END IF; write_to_target (utGen.getRow (indx)); END LOOP; END;
The procedures to generate test packages with test cases are similar to testpkg above, but with a number of extra parameters:
PROCEDURE testpkg ( package_in IN VARCHAR2, grid_in IN grid_tt, program_in IN VARCHAR2 := '%', samepackage_in IN BOOLEAN := FALSE, prefix_in IN VARCHAR2 := NULL, schema_in IN VARCHAR2 := NULL, output_type_in IN PLS_INTEGER := c_screen, dir_in IN VARCHAR2 := NULL, delim_in IN VARCHAR2 := c_delim, date_format_in IN VARCHAR2 := 'MM/DD/YYYY', only_if_in_grid_in IN BOOLEAN := FALSE ); PROCEDURE testpkg_from_file ( package_in IN VARCHAR2, gridfile_loc_in IN VARCHAR2, gridfile_in IN VARCHAR2, program_in IN VARCHAR2 := '%', samepackage_in IN BOOLEAN := FALSE, prefix_in IN VARCHAR2 := NULL, schema_in IN VARCHAR2 := NULL, output_type_in IN PLS_INTEGER := c_screen, dir_in IN VARCHAR2 := NULL, field_delim_in IN VARCHAR2 := '|', arg_delim_in IN VARCHAR2 := c_delim, date_format_in IN VARCHAR2 := 'MM/DD/YYYY', only_if_in_grid_in IN BOOLEAN := FALSE ); PROCEDURE testpkg_from_string ( package_in IN VARCHAR2, grid_in IN VARCHAR2, program_in IN VARCHAR2 := '%', samepackage_in IN BOOLEAN := FALSE, prefix_in IN VARCHAR2 := NULL, schema_in IN VARCHAR2 := NULL, output_type_in IN PLS_INTEGER := c_screen, dir_in IN VARCHAR2 := NULL, line_delim_in IN VARCHAR := CHR (10), field_delim_in IN VARCHAR2 := '|', arg_delim_in IN VARCHAR2 := c_delim, date_format_in IN VARCHAR2 := 'MM/DD/YYYY', only_if_in_grid_in IN BOOLEAN := FALSE );
In each case, the idea is the same. We have to provide not only the arguments supplied to the basic version of testpkg, but also details of each of the test cases in a grid. In the first case, this is as a PL/SQL table, in the second this is as a file and in the final case, this is as a string.
The PL/SQL table passed to testpkg is defined as follows:
TYPE grid_rt IS RECORD ( progname VARCHAR2 (100), overload PLS_INTEGER, tcname VARCHAR2 (100), message VARCHAR2 (2000), arglist VARCHAR2 (2000), return_value VARCHAR2 (2000), assertion_type VARCHAR2 (100)); TYPE grid_tt IS TABLE OF grid_rt INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER;
Where the definitions of the fields are as follows:
progname
- This is the name of the subprogram to be tested.overload
- This is the version of the subprogram where
overladed versions exist. (You may have to look in the data dictionary to
work this out).
tcname
- The name of the test case.message
- The message to be used in the assertion code.arglist
- The list of arguments to be passed to the subprogram.return_value
- The return value to be checked against.assertion_type
- The type of assertion to be used.
Currently this is ignored unless it contains 'EQ' or 'ISNULL'
In testpkg_from_file and testpkg_from_string, exactly the same fields need to be passed (and in the same order). These fields are separated by the character given by the field_delim_in parameter which defaults to '|', the pipe symbol. In the case of testpkg_from_string, we can also specify the line delimiter in the line_delim_in parameter, which defaults to an ASCII linefeed character.
In all cases, the arguments specified in the arglist field are separated by yet another delimiter, which is passed in the arg_delim_in parameter ( or just delim_in in the case of testpkg). This defaults to a semicolon.
The remaining arguments passed to these routines are date_format_in and only_if_in_grid_in. The former gives the date format used in dates passed through the arglist and return_values fields. The latter specifies if tests should only be generated for subprograms listed in the grid or not.
All of this is probably best explained with an example. Suppose I have a package defined as:
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE lottery AS FUNCTION Draw (seed_in NUMBER := NULL, when_in DATE := NULL) RETURN VARCHAR2; END;
This returns a string describing a lottery draw, given a seed and a date. I want to test the following conditions: (It doesn't make much sense, but hey, it's only an example)
So to generate the skeleton I require I could run the following through SQL*Plus:
set serveroutput on size 1000000 declare a_grid utgen.grid_tt; begin a_grid(0).progname := 'Draw'; a_grid(0).tcname := 'Test Case 1'; a_grid(0).message := 'The First Test'; a_grid(0).return_value := '01 02 03 04 05 06'; a_grid(0).assertion_type := 'EQ'; a_grid(1).progname := 'Draw'; a_grid(1).tcname := 'Test Case 2'; a_grid(1).message := 'The Second Test'; a_grid(1).arglist := '7;2001-01-01'; a_grid(1).return_value := '23 24 27 37 39 48'; a_grid(1).assertion_type := 'EQ'; a_grid(2).progname := 'Draw'; a_grid(2).tcname := 'Test Case 3'; a_grid(2).message := 'The Third Test'; a_grid(2).return_value := NULL; a_grid(2).arglist := '0;!SYSDATE'; a_grid(2).assertion_type := 'ISNULL'; utgen.testpkg( package_in => 'LOTTERY', grid_in => a_grid, date_format_in => 'YYYY-MM-DD'); end; /
or the equivalent:
set serveroutput on size 1000000 begin utgen.testpkg_from_string ( package_in => 'LOTTERY', grid_in => 'Draw||Test Case 1|The First Test||01 02 03 04 05 06|EQ Draw||Test Case 2|The Second Test|7;2001-01-01|23 24 27 37 39 48|EQ Draw||Test Case 3|The Third Test|0;!SYSDATE||ISNULL', date_format_in => 'YYYY-MM-DD' ); end; /
which generate the following for the body of ut_draw (tidied up a little for compactness):
PROCEDURE ut_DRAW IS -- Verify and complete data types. against_this VARCHAR2(2000); check_this VARCHAR2(2000); BEGIN -- Define "control" operation for "Test Case 1" against_this := '01 02 03 04 05 06'; -- Execute test code for "Test Case 1" check_this := LOTTERY.DRAW (SEED_IN => '', WHEN_IN => ''); -- Assert success for "Test Case 1" -- Compare the two values. utAssert.eq ( 'The First Test', check_this, against_this); -- End of test for "Test Case 1" -- Define "control" operation for "Test Case 2" against_this := '23 24 27 37 39 48'; -- Execute test code for "Test Case 2" check_this := LOTTERY.DRAW (SEED_IN => 7, WHEN_IN => TO_DATE ('2001-01-01', 'YYYY-MM-DD')); -- Assert success for "Test Case 2" -- Compare the two values. utAssert.eq ( 'The Second Test', check_this, against_this); -- End of test for "Test Case 2" -- Define "control" operation for "Test Case 3" against_this := NULL; -- Execute test code for "Test Case 3" check_this := LOTTERY.DRAW (SEED_IN => 0, WHEN_IN => SYSDATE); -- Assert success for "Test Case 3" -- Check for NULL return value. utAssert.isNULL ( 'The Third Test', check_this); -- End of test for "Test Case 3" END ut_DRAW;
Note that the different data types are handled automatically. So '2001-01-01' is converted to a date using TO_DATE and the specified date format. However, we wanted to enter SYSDATE for our argument in one of these cases. How do we stop this being converted into a date? The answer is that we need to prefix the value with a '!' (an exclamation mark). This causes utGen to pass this along 'as is' without attempting any conversion. Note that this cannot currently be overridden, so if your data starts with an exclamation mark, you'll have to work around this problem.
< Previous Section: utAssert Package | Next Section: utOutput Package >
Copyright © 2000-2005, 2014-2016 Steven Feuerstein, Chris Rimmer, Patrick Barel and the utPLSQL Project. All rights reserved